Legal Opinion
Wiesman v. Metropolitan Museum of Art
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 4, 1991No. 91 Civ. 1754 (WK)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.
This action arises out of a claim that the defendant violated provisions of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Invoking pendant jurisdiction, the complaint also alleges that the defendant’s actions violated provisions of New York’s Human Rights Laws, New York Executive Law § 296, et seq. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), defendant now moves to dismiss the state law claims for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. For the reasons that follow this motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Scott v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Eastman Chemical Products, Inc. v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- DiIorio v. Gibson & Cushman of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Giuffre v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jocelyn Whidbee, Shirlene Tranquille v. Garzarelli Food Specialties, Inc., Ed and John Garzarelli, OwnersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Kelber v. Forest Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Garcia v. Yonkers Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- McDonald v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Wiesman v. Metropolitan Museum of ArtDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992