Legal Opinion
Kelber v. Forest Electric Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 7, 1992No. 90 Civ. 3790 (LJF)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FREEH, District Judge.
In this sex discrimination suit, defendants Forest Electric Corporation (“Forest Electric”) and Forest Datacom Services (“Forest Datacom”) move for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). Plaintiff Laura Kelber (“Kelber”) opposes the motion and argues that genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part. Because Kelber has presented no evidence suggesting that Forest Electric had any control over Forest Datacom’s employment practices, all claims…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Mary Jane ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUGAR TREE PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Krasner v. HSH NORDBANK AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Bridges v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Neufeld v. NeufeldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Medcalf v. Thompson Hine LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.