Legal Opinion
State v. Heller
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 21, 1937PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The information charged that the defendant on or about July 11th, 1936, at Easton, bathed in a stream tributary to a reservoir from which the inhabitants of Bridgeport are supplied with water, in violation of § 2542 of the General Statutes. That statute so far as relevant provides: “Any person who shall bathe in any reservoir from which the inhabit ants of any town, city or borough are supplied with water, or in any lake, pond or stream tributary to such reservoir,” shall be subject to fine, imprisonment, or both. The defendant’s demurrer to the information was overruled. He thereupon elected…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State v. HillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Town of Windsor v. WhitneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Beach v. BradstreetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- State v. MuoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Amsel v. BrooksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Murphy, Inc. v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Florentine v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Brecciaroli v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.