Legal Opinion

Merriott v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 15, 1963No. 374-61PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

In August 1944, plaintiff, then a reserve officer on active service in the Army, appeared before an Army Eetiring Board which found that he was permanently incapacitated for active duty (because of moderate arterial *263hypertension) but also found that this disability originated prior to his service. These findings were approved by the Secretary of the Army in October 1944 and plaintiff was released on January 1,1945, by reason of this physical disability, without disability retirement pay. On December 28, 1959, he applied to the Army Disability Review Board for review of the Retiring Board’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Frank E. Lipp v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  3. Lipp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  4. Boruski v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  5. Egan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  2. Robert A. Walters v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. Denton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  4. Charles H. Debow, Jr. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. Royal Barry Shaw v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API