Legal Opinion
Royal Barry Shaw v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 18, 1966No. 489-54PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge.
A former naval disbursing officer, Lieutenant (j. g.) Royal Barry Shaw, brings this action to recover back pay and allowances under 28 U.S.C. § 1491 on the ground of wrongful dismissal, as well as to obtain “relief from responsibility for [the] loss” of Government funds under the special provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1496 and 2512. 1 Before his dismissal, Lieutenant Shaw was in the Supply Corps, United States Naval Reserve, serving on active duty at the Naval Air Station, Willow Grove, Pennsylvania. On October 4, 1948, he was to be relieved as the disbursing officer by another naval…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Albert H. Carter v. Robert Seamans, Jr., as Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- William L. Calley, Jr., Cross-Appellant v. Howard H. Callaway, Etc., Etc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Ronald Maurice Stump v. John Bennett, Warden, Iowa State Penitentiary, Fort Madison, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Joseph P. Kauffman v. Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Vincin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.