Fretz v. Murray
Michigan Supreme Court
Case made from Kent; Adsit, J. Assumpsit by Harriet C. Fretz against Bernard Murray on a promissory note. Plaintiff had judgment for less than the amount claimed, and she assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This action is brought upon a promissory note of $400, bearing interest at 10 per cent. The note is dated September 26, 1893, and due in three years after date. The cause was tried before the court without a jury, and the court found the following facts and law:
“This action is brought upon a promissory note, of which the following is a copy: * * * This note was given to secure a loan of $400 obtained by Mr. Murray from the plaintiff. Mr. Murray paid to the plaintiff, prior to the commencement of this suit, sums amounting to $135. * * * The defense relied upon is usury, and *303defendant insists…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fowler v. Equitable Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Gill v. RiceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
- Gore v. . LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Bateman v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Stanley v. WestropTexas Supreme Court · 1856
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gladwin State Bank v. DowMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Vandervelde v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Union Guardian Trust Co. v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Waldorf v. ZinbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Continental National Bank of Chicago v. FlemingMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.