Legal Opinion

Whelan v. Whelan

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1948No. Civ. 3933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

In this action for divorce the defendant appeals from an order of the superior court directing him to pay plaintiff the sum of $30 per week as and for alimony pendente lite for the support of herself, and the further sum of $250 for counsel fees, and for $20 costs. It was further ordered that defendant pay to plaintiff all reasonable fees, expenses and charges in relation to the birth of the unborn child of plaintiff and defendant. An order to show cause was issued on the verified complaint and the hearing had on affidavits of the parties.

In the amended complaint plaintiff alleges that she is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Sweeley v. SweeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Loeb v. LoebCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Patton v. PattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Farrar v. FarrarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bernheimer v. BernheimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Forrest v. ForrestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Avnet v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Bluhm v. BluhmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Bruce v. BruceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API