Bluhm v. Bluhm
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
On February 18, 1954, plaintiff and appellant filed an action for divorce against her defendant and respondent husband, alleging cruelty. On the same day, upon plaintiff’s affidavit and the usual questionnaire form adopted by the court, and the pleadings, she obtained an order to show cause on February 26, why defendant should not pay plaintiff’s attorney’s fees, court costs, and alimony pendente lite. On the hearing date, defendant filed the usual form of questionnaire. He attached thereto a copy of a property settlement agreement entered into between the parties on September 5, 1951. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Newman v. FreitasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Hill v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Patton v. PattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Taliaferro v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tompkins v. TompkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Gottlieb v. GottliebCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Trudgen v. TrudgenMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- Trudgen v. TrudgenMontana Supreme Court · 1958