Btesh v. Royal Ins. Co., Limited, of Liverpool
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
Btesh & Company held an “open” policy of insurance issued by the respondent covering marine shipments made by them for their own account, or for the account of others who should so order in writing before the steamer sailed. < One, Cherem, a merchant in Mexico City, bought in New York two parcels of silk from a New York merchant, another of cottons from Btesh, and a third of cotton napkins from a third person. He had the silk merchant make four wooden cases, pack the silks in two of these, and lend them with the two empty cases to Btesh. Btesh then filled the two empty…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- M'lanahan v. the Universal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Sun Mutual Insurance v. Ocean InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Muller v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. BalfourCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
- Smith v. Columbia InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1851
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Knight v. U.S. Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Knight v. U.S. Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Christiania General Insurance Corporation of New York v. Great American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. Balfour MacLaine International Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.