Legal Opinion

St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Balfour

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 23, 1909No. 1,526PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.

1Opinion of the Court

DR HAVEN, District Judge.

This case is before us on a writ of error, and the action is one which was brought by the defendants in error (who for greater convenience will be hereafter, in this opinion, referred to as plaintiffs) to recover from the plaintiff in error (hereinafter called the defendant) the sum of $6,100 on a general policy of marine insurance.

The complaint contains two causes of action: One to recover $4,-350, on account of the alleged loss of 5,000 sacks of flour carried by the German ship Arabia on a voyage from Portland, Or., to Kobe, Japan; the other to recover $1,750, on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Redd v. MurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Btesh v. Royal Ins. Co., Limited, of LiverpoolCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  2. University City, Mo. v. Home Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  3. Regional Enterprises, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. Ross Engineering Co. v. PaceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
  5. Cruce v. Pierce Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API