Legal Opinion
Atwood v. Independent School District No. 51, Foley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 31, 1984No. CX-83-635PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
This appeal raises procedural issues relating to Minnesota’s Teacher Tenure Statute, Minn.Stat. §§ 125.01-.611 (1982). More specifically, the instant case requires us to reconcile the procedural rights accorded teachers placed on an unrequested leave of absence pursuant to a plan negoti ated under Minn.Stat. § 125.12, subd. 6a (1982), and our holding in Jerviss v. Independent School District No. 294, 273 N.W.2d 638 (Minn.1978).
In 1974, appellant, Foley School Board (hereinafter Board), and the Foley Education Association (FEA), exclusive bargaining agent for the teachers…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ganyo v. Independent School District No. 832Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Liffrig v. Independent School Dist. No. 442Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Zeller v. Prior Lake Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Jerviss v. Independent School District No. 294Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Foley Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 51Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Lunde v. Independent School District No. 255Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re Independent School District No. 318 HearingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- In Re the Proposed Placement on Unrequested Leave of BristolCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.