Legal Opinion

Reiling v. City of Eagan

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 1, 2003No. CX-03-249PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT H. SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellants Roger and Gladys Reiling, Ray and Marilyn Sandford, Patricia and Frank Pavlik, and Ray-Mar Rental challenge the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing their claim, alleging that respondent City of Eagan improperly included their property in a redevelopment tax increment financing (TIF) district. By notice of review, respondent argues the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to review respondent’s quasi-judicial TIF determination. We affirm.

FACTS

By resolution passed in February 2002, the Eagan city council created a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sonoco Products Co. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  2. West St. Paul Federation of Teachers v. Independent School District No. 197Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API