Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided September 30, 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Keith M. Ingram State Representative Post Office Box 1028 West Memphis, Arkansas 72303-1028

Dear Representative Ingram:

I am writing in response to your request for my opinion on the following:

For assessment purposes, is a parcel of land still contiguous if separated by:(a) water;(b) public or private road;(c) railroad;(d) power line; or(e) other right of way?

RESPONSE

I assume this question is asked in the context of the listing and valuing of land for general property tax purposes.1 Assuming further that an Arkansas court would look to other jurisdictions for guidance on this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Petition of MallarySupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
  2. Hoogenboom v. City of BeaufortCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Douglas v. Medical Investors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  4. Town of Lenox v. OglesbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Wiesenfeld v. Township of South BrunswickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API