Legal Opinion
State v. Oehm
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided April 26, 1984No. 55,777PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rees, J.:
Upon his conviction of driving while under the influence of alcohol (K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 8-1567[a]), defendant was sentenced as a second offender to 90 days’ imprisonment and additional penalties (K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 8-1567[d]). The imprisonment portion of defendant’s sentence was imposed by the trial court in compliance with the statutory mandate for second offenders. Defendant appeals from his sentence.
Insofar as here pertinent, K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 8-1567 provides:
“(a) No person shall operate any vehicle within this state while under the influence of alcohol.
“(c) Upon a first conviction…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. LoudermilkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- State v. OsobaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. LaurickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- State v. DelacruzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- Bilbrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- State v. PriestSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- Paletta v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.