Legal Opinion

State v. Priest

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 18, 1986No. 58,945PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

Defendant Carol Priest, who had completed one DUI diversion program and pled nolo contendere to a second DUI charge, was sentenced as a first-time DUI offender because the record of the prior diversion agreement failed to show that she had been advised of her right to legal counsel or that she had given a valid waiver of that right. The State appeals the sentencing pursuant to K.S.A. 22-3602(b)(3).

On October 19, 1983, the defendant, Carol A. Priest, entered a diversion program with the City of Topeka in lieu of further criminal proceedings…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. State v. ClevengerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. State v. OehmCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Kenneth O. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  2. Sargent v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  3. State v. DelacruzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  4. State v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  5. Sheffield v. City of Pass ChristianMississippi Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API