State v. Priest
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Lockett, J.:
Defendant Carol Priest, who had completed one DUI diversion program and pled nolo contendere to a second DUI charge, was sentenced as a first-time DUI offender because the record of the prior diversion agreement failed to show that she had been advised of her right to legal counsel or that she had given a valid waiver of that right. The State appeals the sentencing pursuant to K.S.A. 22-3602(b)(3).
On October 19, 1983, the defendant, Carol A. Priest, entered a diversion program with the City of Topeka in lieu of further criminal proceedings…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. ClevengerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- State v. OehmCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Kenneth O. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Sargent v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
- State v. DelacruzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- State v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- Sheffield v. City of Pass ChristianMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.