Paletta v. City of Topeka
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Lewis, J.:
Petitioner, Shane L. Paletta, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The trial court dismissed the petition as being without merit. This appeal followed.
Petitioner entered into a diversion agreement with the City of Topeka in 1986 in order to avoid being prosecuted for DUI. At the time he entered into the agreement, he was not represented by counsel, was not informed of his right to counsel, and did not waive his right to counsel. Petitioner apparently lived up to the terms of the diversion, and he was never prosecuted or imprisoned for the 1986 DUI charge.
In 1990, petitioner…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. WoodruffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. KeethMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- CUELLARBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2012
- People v. RichertMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. TimsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.