Legal Opinion
Doe v. S & S Consolidated I.S.D.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided June 26, 2001No. 4:99CV00238PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER.
PAUL N. BROWN, District Judge.
At its root, this case is about whether S & S Consolidated I.S.D.’s (“SS CISD”), Joe Wardell’s (“Wardell”), and Missy Im-bert’s (“Imbert”) (together, the “Defendants”) treatment of an emotionally, disturbed elementary school student — Jane Doe — violated the student’s constitutional rights. Specifically, Mrs. Doe, individually and as next friend of Jane Doe, charges the Defendants with having violated Jane Doe’s substantive due process rights by wrapping her in a blanket in order to restrain her during behavioral disturbances. Having…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- A.W. v. Humble Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- Thomas ex rel. D.T. v. City of New OrleansDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2012
- Doe v. Dallas Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2016
- S.N.B. v. Pearland Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- Ashley G. v. Copperas Cove Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.