Legal Opinion

A.W. v. Humble Independent School District

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided June 11, 2014No. Civil Action No. H-13-3551PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SIM LAKE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, A.W. and her mother, Mary King-White, bring this action against defendants, the Humble Independent School District (“HISD”), Amanda Michelle Feenstra (“Feenstra”), Guy Sconzo (“Scon-zo”), Charles Ned (“Ned”), Juan Melendez (“Melendez”), Tammy McHale (“McHale”), Craig Stowers (“Stowers”), and Alicia Nar-cisse (“Narcisse”), for violation of civil rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988, and Title IX of the Education Act of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681. Plaintiffs have also asserted tort…

2Cases cited94 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Pollard v. Georgetown School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  2. Light v. Whittington (In re Whittington)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2014
  3. Pham v. University of Louisiana at MonroeDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2016
  4. Adams v. LandryDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022
  5. Adams v. LandryDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API