Legal Opinion
Ahearn v. Ahearn
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided December 14, 1999No. 98-39, 98-40, 98-215PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEHMAN, Chief Justice.
Acting pro se, as he did in the district court, Francis Ahearn appeals from three orders entered by that court. After consolidating these cases and reviewing Ahearn’s various claims, we conclude that the district court’s rulings were appropriate in all respects. We affirm.
ISSUES
Appellant Francis Ahearn recites multiple issues in each of these cases. In case No. 98-39, he presents the following issues for our review:
I. Can a Court Order one and only one parent to provide all of the child support for both children and not hold the other parent accountable for equal support…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Springer v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Stadtfeld v. StadtfeldWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Willowbrook Ranch, Inc. v. Nugget Exploration, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Schulthess v. CarolloWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- G.C.I., Inc. v. HaughtWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Chancler v. MeredithWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Burnett v. SteeleyWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Reynolds v. MilatzoWyoming Supreme Court · 2007