Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Milatzo

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2007No. 06-217PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Barbara and Laurrie Reynolds (Sellers), the sellers under a contract for deed, sought to enforce the default provisions of the contract against the buyers, John and Diana Milatzo (Buyers). The district court refused to order that the property reverted to Sellers, but granted a money judgment in favor of Sellers because they had paid taxes and insurance on the property for which, under the terms of the contract, Buyers were responsible. We conclude that Sellers waived strict compliance with the terms of the contract and failed to comply -with the default notification…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. MULLINNIX LLC v. HKB Royalty TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Wells Fargo Bank Wyoming, N.A. v. HodderWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Angus Hunt Ranch, Inc. v. Reb, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Deroche v. R.L. Manning Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. DB v. State, Department of Family ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Gillette v. Hladky Const., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Cook v. EddyWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Ultra Resources, Inc., a Wyoming CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API