Legal Opinion

Schulthess v. Carollo

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1992No. 91-150PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

George Carollo (Carollo) filed a petition with the State Board of Control (Board) to have Wallace Schulthess’ (Schulthess) original supply water rights to 116 acres and his supplemental supply water rights to 37.78 of the 116 acres declared abandoned. Following a hearing, the Board issued an order which granted Carollo’s petition as to Schulthess’ original and supplemental supply water rights to 37.78 acres and denied his petition as to the remaining 78.22 acres. Schulthess timely filed a petition for review with the district court, claiming that Carol-lo lacked standing, that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Washakie County School District Number One v. HerschlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Wind River Indian Education Ass'n v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. Public Service Commission of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Geraud v. SchraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Cathcart v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Jolley v. State Loan & Investment BoardWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Moncrief v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State Ex Rel. Bayou Liquors, Inc. v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Southwestern Public Service Co. v. Thunder Basin Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API