Legal Opinion
Bowser v. Jacobs
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 19, 1971No. Docket 8197, 8353, 8464PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLesinski, C. J.
In the cases before us we are squarely faced with determining the constitutionality of that portion of the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Act (hereinafter the Act) which prevents those covered by workmen’s compensation from *325applying to the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (hereinafter the Fund) for payment. MCLA § 257.1101, et seq. (Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 9.2801, et seq.).
To facilitate adjudication of this question, this Court ordered that the three causes captioned above be consolidated. All of the cases presently before us are factually identical: plaintiffs are taxicab operators who, while…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Levy v. Louisiana Ex Rel. Charity HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Allied American Mutual Fire Insurance v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Fox v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Douglas v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. KurylowiczMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Pollock v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Weisberg v. DET. AUTO. INTER-INS. EX.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.