Legal Opinion

O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 1976No. Docket 25429PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Burns, J.

Plaintiffs are the wife and children of Gary O’Donnell, who was fatally injured in an automobile accident. Mr. O’Donnell was covered by a no-fault automobile insurance policy issued by the defendant, and plaintiffs are dependents of decedent for purposes of survivor’s loss benefits.

Decedent’s insurance policy provided that the maximum survivor’s loss benefits would not exceed $1,000 per 30-day period and that the amount payable by the insurance company would be reduced by amounts paid or payable to the survivors under state or federal law.

Plaintiffs were entitled to the maximum benefits of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Richardson v. BelcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Manistee Bank & Trust Co. v. McGowanMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Fox v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Miller v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Pollock v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Hill v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API