Legal Opinion

Knight v. Myers

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 7, 1988No. 60,257PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Six, J.:

Plaintiff appellants, Norman and Rebecca Knight (the Knights), appeal the trial court’s decision sustaining appellee Douglas B. Myers’ motion for summary judgment. The trial court held plaintiffs’ malpractice claims against attorney Myers were barred by the statute of limitations. This court finds no error and affirms.

The issues are: (1) When the Knights’ alleged action for legal malpractice accrued; and (2) whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for defendant Myers.

In July 1980, the Austin Pool Company (Austin) installed a swimming pool in the back yard of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Steketee v. Lintz, Williams & RothbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Pancake House, Inc. v. Redmond Ex Rel. RedmondSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  3. Slaymaker v. Westgate State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  4. Hecht v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  5. Roe v. DiefendorfSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Pizel v. ZuspannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. Bick v. Peat Marwick & MainCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
  3. Bi-State Development Co. v. Shafer, Kline & Warren, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1999
  4. Bagby v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  5. Geiger-Schorr v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API