Central Bank of Kansas City v. Costanzo
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ELLIS, Judge.
Douglas Adams appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered in favor of Central Bank of Kansas City (Central Bank) in this *673action on a promissory note. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in entering a judgment based upon evidence adduced at a hearing held before another judge. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
On June 6,1988, Adams, Donald Costanzo, Carl Artese and Kian Shafe executed a promissory note in the amount of $186,-022.55, with eleven per cent annual interest, payable to Central Bank. After Central Bank was given a security…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Lancaster v. SimmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Mayfield v. City of JoplinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Rozansky Feed Co., Inc. v. Monsanto Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Smith v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of SeylerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- Ard v. Shannon County CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Commonwealth, Board of Examiners of Psychology v. FunkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2002
- JOHNNY ROBERTS and DEBRA ROBERTS, Plaintiffs-Respondents v. WAYNE J. SHAW, LINDA LANE, and RICHARD OGDEN, TRUSTEE OF TOWN & COUNTRY BANK, and BETTY J. SHAWMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Compton v. ComptonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.