Legal Opinion

Central Bank of Kansas City v. Costanzo

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1994No. WD 47952PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLIS, Judge.

Douglas Adams appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered in favor of Central Bank of Kansas City (Central Bank) in this *673action on a promissory note. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in entering a judgment based upon evidence adduced at a hearing held before another judge. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

On June 6,1988, Adams, Donald Costanzo, Carl Artese and Kian Shafe executed a promissory note in the amount of $186,-022.55, with eleven per cent annual interest, payable to Central Bank. After Central Bank was given a security…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Lancaster v. SimmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State Ex Rel. Mayfield v. City of JoplinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Rozansky Feed Co., Inc. v. Monsanto Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Smith v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of SeylerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  2. Ard v. Shannon County CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Commonwealth, Board of Examiners of Psychology v. FunkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2002
  4. JOHNNY ROBERTS and DEBRA ROBERTS, Plaintiffs-Respondents v. WAYNE J. SHAW, LINDA LANE, and RICHARD OGDEN, TRUSTEE OF TOWN & COUNTRY BANK, and BETTY J. SHAWMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Compton v. ComptonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API