Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Green Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2009No. Docket 136423PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

We granted leave to appeal to consider whether an action to partition real estate may go forward when the joint tenant who filed the action died before an order of partition entered.1 We would hold that title vested in the surviving joint tenant on the decedent’s death because the mere filing of a partition action does not sever a joint tenancy and no order granting partition was entered before the death. We would thus affirm the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for summary disposition and the judgment of the Court of Appeals on the partition issue.

I. PACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

At issue…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cardinal Mooney High School v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Albro v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Midgley v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Smith v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Heintz v. HudkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McCORMICK v. CARRIERMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Jackson v. Estate of GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Joshua Seymour v. Richard G. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
  4. Cindy Schaaf v. Charlene ForbesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Cindy Schaaf v. Charlene ForbesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API