Legal Opinion

Evonik Degussa GMBH v. Materia, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 28, 2018No. 09–cv–636 (NLH/JS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILLMAN, District Judge:

Before the Court are three separate but overlapping motions filed by Evonik. First is an informal motion by Evonik to find inequitable conduct. Second is Evonik's Motion to set aside the judgment of no willfulness, find Materia's pre-verdict infringement willful on summary judgment, and find Materia's post-verdict infringement willful on summary judgment. Third *567is Evonik's Motion for enhanced damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284.

These motions come to the Court following a January 2017 jury trial on the issues of lack of enablement, lack of an adequate written…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  5. Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rembrandt Techs., LP v. Comcast of Fla./Pa., LP (In Re Rembrandt Techs. LP)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  2. In re MarinariUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. ANDERSON v. TIKTOK, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. In Re Rembrandt Techs., Lp Patent Litig.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  5. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. v. Auris Health, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API