Oregon & Washington Railroad v. Vulcan Iron Works
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered June 21, 1909, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action of unlawful detainer.
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, C. J.
On the 8th of February, 1906, the defendant conveyed the real property now in controversy to one Mary L. Struve by warranty deed; on the same day Mary L. Struve conveyed by warranty deed to the Washington Northern Railway Company; and on the 24th day of July, 1906, the Washington Northern Railway Company conveyed to the plaintiff, the Oregon and Washington Railroad Company. The present action was instituted by the latter company under the unlawful detainer statute to recover posses*373sion of the demanded premises. The fourth allegation of its complaint was as follows:
“That prior to January 1,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hubenthal v. Spokane & Inland Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
- Watkins v. BalchWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- McLennan v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Morris v. Healy Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
- Hawver v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by2 opinions
- Provident Mutual Life Insurance v. ThrowerWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Monroe v. StaytWashington Supreme Court · 1910