Legal Opinion

Smith v. Noble Drilling Co.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided August 31, 1967No. Civ. A. 14610PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUBIN, District Judge:

During the trial of this case the parties stipulated that, in the event the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, the Court would decide all issues concerning defendant’s right to credit for the amount previously paid as benefits under the Longshoremen and Harbor Workers’ Act, 1 and the amount by which the jury award is to be increased to reflect the amount due the plaintiff as maintenance and cure. It was further stipulated that defendant has paid $3,-812.66 in medical and $3,010.00 in compensation at the rate of $70.00 per week.

Since it has been determined that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Karl Weiss, Jr. v. Central Railroad Company of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. McCarthy v. American Eastern CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  3. Gulf Oil Corporation v. Lone Star Producing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Heidt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  5. Pure Oil Co. v. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alfred M. Massey v. Williams-Mcwilliams, Inc., Williams-Mcwilliams, Inc. v. A. M. MasseyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Onaway Transportation Company v. Offshore Tugs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Duplantis v. Williams-McWilliams Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
  4. ITT SEMICONDUCTORS v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  5. Budge v. PostDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API