Legal Opinion
Heidt v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 22, 1932No. 6265PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*560SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.
The United States recovered judgment against Grayson V. Heidt for overpayments made to him as an active officer of the army between July 1, 1922, and January 1, 1929, and he appeals.
The ease was tried by the court without a' jury on an agreed, statement of facts in brief as follows: Heidt became a commissioned officer February 15, 1899; was retired to the inactive list September 21, 1908, because of disabilities incurred in the line of duty, but not due to wounds received in action. After five years, ten months, and twenty-six days of retirement he was put on active duty…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wisconsin Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United States v. BurchardSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Walker v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Alabama · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Fansteel Metallurgical Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
- Mount Sinai Hospital of Greater Miami, Inc. v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1974
- United States v. PaddockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- Granzow v. Village of Lyons, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Leonard v. GageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.