Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Sleepy Eye v. Sleeper

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 16, 1926No. 7050PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MUNGER, District Judge.

The plaintiff in error brought suit to recover upon a general guaranty of the payment of a promissory note. At the conclusion of the evidence the court directed a verdict in favor of the defendants. The assignments of error relate to the direction of a verdict and to the admission of evidence. Most of the facts are undisputed. John W. Dalton executed a promissory note dated September 15, 1914, agreeing to pay J. C. Peters $4,000 on October 1, 1919, with interest at 6 per cent, payable annually, as evidenced by six interest coupons attached to the note. He also executed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Midland Railway Co. v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Sellers v. GreerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Parker v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Bowen v. Chenoa-Hignite Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Old Jordan Mining & Milling Co. v. Société Anonyme Des MinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  2. Woodbury v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1961
  3. Rogers v. Furness, Withy & Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1951
  4. New York Life Ins. v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  5. J. P. C. Petroleum Corp. v. Vulcan Steel Tank Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API