Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Furness, Withy & Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided November 13, 1951No. Civ. A. 4922PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Chief Judge.
Defendant has moved for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., upon the ground that plaintiff failed to commence this action within the time limitation provided by the contract ticket made between the parties.
From the deposition of plaintiff taken by defendant it appears that plaintiff in March, 1950, was a high school teacher; that she took a leave of absence for one month, commencing on the 20th of that month; that she went to the Caribbean, to St. Thomas, St. Kitts and to Trinidad, sailing on the S. S. Fort Amherst of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- The MajesticSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Murrary v. . Cunard Steamship Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Fonseca v. Cunard Steamship Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Foster v. Cunard White Star, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Maibrunn v. Hamburg-American S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Marek, Harriet and Marek, Samuel Husband and Wife v. Marpan Two, Inc. And Bahama Cruise Line, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Regina M. Muratore v. M/s Scotia Prince, Etc., Prince of Fundy Cruises, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Hodes v. S.N.C. Achille Lauro ed Altri-GestioneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Oltman v. Holland America Line USA, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Oltman v. Holland America Line USA, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.