Legal Opinion
Woodbury v. United States
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 8, 1961No. Civ. 9403PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, District Judge.
Plaintiff claims the right to recover $853,676.82 from defendant under the Federal Tort Claims Act (Title 28 U.S. C.A. §§ 1346(b) and 2671 through 2680). The claim grows out of the plaintiff’s interest in a housing development at Kodiak, Alaska, which development involved the plaintiff and several governmental agencies. In order to fully understand the issues, it is necessary to have a clear picture of the agencies involved.
Housing and Home Finance Agency and Housing and Home Finance Administrator (hereinafter called HHFA) was created by the Reorganization Plan No. 3…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ray B. Woodbury v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Zequeira v. Municipal Housing Authority of the CapitalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
- United States v. WoodburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Charles H. Blanchard, D/B/A Blanchard Construction Co. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Charles H. Blanchard, D/B/A Blanchard Construction Co. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Superior Oil Co. v. UdallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.