Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Chenoa-Hignite Coal Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 18, 1916PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Bell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Cotiet by

Judge Settle

— Affirming.

The pntpose of the appellant, M. S. Bowen, in bringing this action in the court below was to recover of the appellee, Chenoa-Hignite Coal Company, a corporation engaged in mining and selling coal, damages for the violation of an alleged contract whereby, as averred in the petition, it employed him to serve it as superintendent and foreman of its coal mine for the term of one year, beginning October 1, 1914, “at a salary of $150.00 per month, with residence and coal for his private use, furnished free of cost and with the privilege of buying his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wright v. . WeeksNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Ringer v. HoltzclawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. OffuttCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  4. Smith v. TheobaldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  5. Victoria Limestone Co. v. HintonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Laurent v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
  2. Putnam v. Producers' Live Stock Marketing Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Morgan v. Mengel Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. Louisville N. R. Co. v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  5. Clay v. Louisville N. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API