Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Eubanks

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 29, 1987No. 86-233PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

This is a legal malpractice case. George and Cassandra McDonald retained Gary Eubanks to represent them in a personal injury lawsuit which was tried in Saline County. In that action the jury returned a verdict for the defendant which meant that the McDonalds lost their case. Eubanks failed to file an appeal. The McDonalds filed suit against Eubanks for negligence in the way he handled their lawsuit. Eubanks moved for summary judgment. The motion was accompanied by an affidavit by Eubanks and two other lawyers who represented the other side in the personal injury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Givens v. HixsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Hughes Western World, Inc. v. Westmoor Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Cummings, Inc. v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Brewington v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sturgis v. SkokosSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Sundeen v. KrogerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Renfro v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Green v. Alpharma, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Black v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API