Sundeen v. Kroger
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Justice.
We granted appellant Michael Sunticpetition e. review in this appeal. Sundeen was initially found guilty in municipal court of obstructing and attempting to influence governmental operations. Sundeen appealed to circuit court where the State nolle prossed the charges. Sundeen subsequently filed suit against Kroger and its security officer for malicious prosecution and abuse of process. We are asked to decide what effect the State’s nolle prosse later had in Sundeen’s civil suit now on appeal. When we grant a petition for review, we consider the appeal as though it had…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Cordes v. Outdoor Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Palmer Ford, Inc. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Routh Wrecker Service, Inc. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Harold McLaughlin Reliable Truck Brokers, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Eady v. LansfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- McMullen v. McHughes Law FirmSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
- Hamilton v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
- National Bank of Arkansas v. River Crossing Partners, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
- Pest Management, Inc. v. LangerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Sawada v. Walmart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.