Thompson v. Royal Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CIRILLO, President Judge:
Appellant, Royal Globe Insurance Company (Royal), appeals from an order denying its petition to vacate, modify or correct an award of arbitrators. The trial court held that the arbitrators committed no error of law in concluding that *81the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act1 did not bar appellee’s recovery of uninsured motorist benefits under her employer’s fleet policy. The trial court similarly supported the arbitrators’ conclusions that the insurance contract at issue afforded appellee coverage in excess of the limit of $15,000 indicated in documents produced by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Cowden v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Shearer v. ReedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Boris v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Ehrlich v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Everhart v. PMA Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Groff v. Continental InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Lastooka v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Werkman v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Dayton v. Employers Mutual Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.