Legal Opinion

Hattenburg v. Blanks

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1977No. 12380PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Per curiam

During the period from February 7 to 14, 1975, claimant-appellant Kenneth Hattenburg allegedly sustained an injury compensable under Idaho’s Workmen’s Compensation Law. On February 3, 1976, he filed with the Industrial Commission a form entitled “Application for Hearing” which requested a hearing and an award for his injury. At the hearing, held on August 23, 1976, respondents moved to dismiss this action on the ground that appellant had failed to file a claim for compensation within one year of the accident as required by I.C. § 72-701. This appeal is from the order granting that motion.

Appel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. University of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
  2. In Re HaynesIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Haynes v. J. E. Hall Contractors, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Craig v. Electrolux CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Kinney v. Tupperware Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Mapusaga v. Red Lion Riverside InnIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Sprague v. Caldwell Transportation Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Hansen v. Estate of HarveyIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Miller v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API