Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Baur v. Medina County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2000No. 00-1534PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Relators request a writ of prohibition to prevent respondents from submitting the referendum to the electors. In extraordinary actions like prohibition challenging the quasi-judicial decision of a board of elections, “the applicable standard is whether the board engaged in fraud or corruption, abused its discretion, or acted in clear disregard of applicable legal provisions.” State ex rel. Crossman Communities of Ohio, Inc. v. Greene Cty. Bd. of Elections (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 132, 135-136, 717 N.E.2d 1091, 1095.

Relators contend that they are entitled to the requested extraordinary relief to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sinay v. SoddersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Christy v. Summit County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Markus v. Trumbull County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State ex rel. O'Beirne v. Geauga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Crossman Communities of Ohio, Inc. v. Greene County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Phillips v. Lorain County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State ex rel. McCord v. Delaware County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Browne v. Artex Oil Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State ex rel. Oster v. Lorain County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State ex rel. Phillips v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API