Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Clark

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 6, 1979No. 60221Published

1DissentSeiler, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The loose-leaf desk calendar, Exhibit 48, was not described in the search warrant. Its warrantless seizure was therefore per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment, as the principal opinion concedes, unless it can be brought under one of the exceptions. The state carries a heavy burden to show that the seizing of the desk calendar falls within the particular exception. Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 455, 91 S.Ct. 2022, 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971); Vale v. Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 34, 90 S.Ct. 1969, 26 L.Ed.2d 409 (1970). This, for the reasons set forth below,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. Derl GrayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  4. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. United States v. Jacques Berenguer, A/K/A Guy SebbaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API