Legal Opinion
A.A. Metcalf Moving & Storage Co. v. North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale Schools
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 29, 1998No. C5-98-1308PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARVEY A. HOLTAN, Judged
Appellant challenges the district court’s finding that Minnesota tariff-rate schedules govern the disposition in this case. Because the district court incorrectly interpreted both (1) whether federal law preempted state motor carrier tariff schedules, and (2) the terms of the parties’ carrier contract, we reverse.
FACTS
In 1996, while preparing to move into a new building one block away, appellant, Independent School District No. 622, contacted three professional moving companies, inelud-*314ing respondent A.A. Metcalf Moving & Storage Company, to solicit quotes for…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- S O Designs USA, Inc. v. Rollerblade, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- A.A. Metcalf Moving & Storage Co. v. North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale SchoolsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2004