Legal Opinion
MacManus v. A. E. Realty Partners
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 19, 1983No. Civ. 30250PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TROTTER, P. J.
Plaintiffs appeal a judgment of dismissal following the sustaining of a demurrer to their third amended complaint without leave to amend. We reverse the judgment holding the complaint states a cause of action for violations of Civil Code section 2995 and the Cartwright Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 16700 et seq.)
The complaint alleges the following facts which are presumed true for purposes of reviewing the order sustaining the demurrer. (Bohrer v. County of San Diego (1980) 104 Cal.App.3d 155, 158 [163 Cal.Rptr. 419].)
Frederick O. MacManus and Barbara-Helene Smith…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Goehring v. Chapman UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Lake Communications, Inc. v. ICC Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Morrison v. Viacom, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- MacManus v. A. E. Realty PartnersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.