State v. Chaney
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HYDE, Chief Justice.
An opinion in this case, adopted in Division No. 1 but transferred to Banc, was not adopted in Banc. The facts from the Divisional opinion, hereinafter set out (without, quotation marks), are adopted as a sufficient, statement.
Lawrence Chaney and Herbert Metcalf were jointly charged with robbery in the first degree and each was also charged under the Habitual Criminal Act as amended in 1959, V.A.M.S. § 556.280. The trial court found one or more of the previous convictions as to each defendant, a jury found' defendants guilty of robbery as charged,, and Chaney was sentenced…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- State v. BradleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- State v. BranstetterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. SpicaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- State v. LangSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- State v. GartonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- State v. MichaelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- State v. HegwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.