Legal Opinion
Rumley v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 22, 1965No. Cong. No. 4-61PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, Judge
This congressional reference case1 was filed pursuant to H. Ees. 249, 87th Cong., 1st Sess., passed by the House of Eep-resentatives on July 10,1961. That resolution directed this court to report to Congress regarding the nature of a claim presented by the estate of George S. Eumley, and the amount, *102if any, legally or equitably due from the United States.2 The word “plaintiff” hereinafter refers to George S. Bumley.3
The plaintiff and the defendant were parties to three separate contracts. Plaintiff asserts a valid claim founded upon one contract and the defendant admits the amount involved in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Burkhardt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
- Creek Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Josephine C. Rumley, Administratrix of the Estate of George S. Rumley D/B/A George S. Rumley Shoe Manufacturing Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
- Rumley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Herman Adams, Doing Business as Adams Manufacturing Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Rawlins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- California Canners & Growers Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Amick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- North Counties Hydro-Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.