Rumley v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtDueeee, Judge
Plaintiff sues for an amount allegedly due on a contract for the manufacture of duffel bags for the Army. The defendant does not deny that it is indebted to the plaintiff on that contract, but it has asserted a counterclaim based on damages allegedly due raider an earlier but similar manufacturing contract which, if judgment is entered thereon, would leave a net amount owing the defendant.1
The first contract in point of time, DA-30-280-Q,M-3833 (hereinafter referred to as Contract 3833), was awarded to plaintiff on June 16,1950, pursuant to his bid of 47 cents per duffel bag on 190,000 units.…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Astro-Space Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Marley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Tester Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.