Legal Opinion

Creek Nation v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 11, 1964No. Appeal No. 9-63PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoweN, Chief Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Indian Claims Commission granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that appellant’s claim was res judicata, *486having been, decided by this court in The Creek Nation v. United States, 93 Ct. Cl. 561 (1941).1 Commissioner Scott dissented.

Appellant brought its suit before the Commission to recover the value of 1,198.99 acres of former Creek lands erroneously included in lands surveyed for the Seminole Tribe by appellee’s surveyor Hackbusch in 1888. Under Section 2, Clauses 3 and 5 of the Indian Claims Commission Act of 1946 (60 Stat.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Choctaw Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. United States v. Choctaw NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Otoe and Missouria Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Container Transport International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  2. Klamath & Modoc Tribes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  3. Lipan Apache Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Confederated Tribes of Colville Reservation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  5. Red Lake Band v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API