Ex Parte Schmitz
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The petitioner, against whom has been found and presented an indictment purporting to charge him with the crime of extortion, seeks his discharge on habeas corpus from the custody of the sheriff of the city and county of San Francisco upon two grounds, viz.: 1. That one of the grand jurors who participated in the finding of the indictment was incompetent to act as a grand juror, by reason of the fact that he had served and been discharged as a juror by a court of record of this state, within a year of the time that he was examined and impaneled to act as such grand juror; and 2.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- In Re GowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- In Re. Dykes and BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re PetersenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Matter of FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- In Re McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Ex parte BeachDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1919
- State v. WellerArizona Supreme Court · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.