Legal Opinion

In Re McCoy

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1909No. Crim. No. 79PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPLICATION for discharge upon writ of habeas corpus to the sheriff of Lassen County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Petitioner was, on August 3, 1908, complained against for a misdemeanor in violating an ordinance of the county of Lassen requiring a license to be paid for raising, grazing, herding and pasturing sheep and lambs within said county; a warrant of arrest was issued by a justice of the peace and was duly served by arresting the defendant (petitioner here) and bringing him into the magistrate’s court on said day, whereupon he was committed to the custody of the sheriff of Lassen county “pending the calling of his case for trial” and was by the sheriff taken into custody. Petitioner thereupon, to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. In Re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Ex parte WhitwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Ex parte KearnyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Ex Parte FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rescue Army v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. In Re MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Pawnee County, Excise Board v. KurnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. State ex rel. Eveland v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  5. McCray v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API