In Re. Dykes and Baker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Original Proceeding in the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Bueeoed, C. J.:
The petitioners were at the February term, 1902, of the district court of Comanche county, indicted for the crime of grand larceny. They were arrested and admitted to bail, and have been at liberty' ever since. They claim that they have not had a trial as required by section 5419, stat. 1893, and they ask this court to discharge them on háleos corpus. It is conceded that they are not in custody, but the county attorney has stipulated that for the purposes of this bearing, it may be considered that they are in the custody of the sheriff. We cannot consent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wales v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- In Re LancasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Respublica v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1801
- In Re GowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Ex parte WalkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Matter of FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Ekstrand v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Sims v. CaruthersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
- Ex Parte SchmitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. WellerArizona Supreme Court · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.