Zeth v. Pennsylvania R.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
Zeth Case
Rule 9, Sec. 1, of the Rules of this Court is as follows: “In every action in which the plaintiff or the complainant is not at the time of suit brought a resident of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, or being so, afterwards removes from the District; and in every other case where a defendant, or other person for him, shall make affidavit that he believes the costs could not be recovered of the plaintiff by attachment or execution, a rule for security for costs may be entered, upon due notice, and in default of such security being given at a time…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bankers Securities Corp. v. Ritz Carlton Restaurant & Hotel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- United States v. French Sardine Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Clair v. Philadelphia Storage Battery Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
3Cited by7 opinions
- John Hawes, Etc. v. Club Ecuestre El Comandante, Nancy Kreitzer v. Puerto Rican Cars, Inc., Daniel Ventura v. El Conquistador HotelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Levine v. BradleeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- Hall Laboratories, Inc. v. Millar Bros. & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Marks v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Di Filippo v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.